Existence of trade union movement strengthens democracy
It seems that the world is increasingly operating on the terms of money. More and more, politics is influenced by economically powerful actors who have the resources to influence decision-making in a sustained and effective way. This raises a question: what should a politician rely on to ensure the continuity of their work?
One option is to place trust in influential and wealthy actors, provided that policy align with their interests. Another option is to trust the people and believe that voters will reward with a new term when they feel they have been genuinely represented.
Here lies the key question in politics: should it focus primarily on centralising power and resources, or on defending the everyday lives and rights of ordinary citizens?
When we look at the world around us, we can see a trend in many major countries where citizens feel their ability to influence is weakening. The role of money in politics has grown significantly. This development raises concerns about the future of democracy.
“The key issue is not only who holds power, but to whom they feel accountable.”
Harri Järvelin
How can democracy and the credibility of politics be strengthened? One possible answer lies in an organised civil society. Globally, no movement promotes shared interests more widely than the trade union movement.
This is not about returning to old divisions, but about who can bring together large numbers of people in support of shared rights and democratic rules. The trade union movement operates in almost every country, reaching a large share of the working-age population. It is one of the few structures with a genuine capacity to balance economic power.
At the same time, it must be acknowledged that the trade union movement is not without its problems. It needs to renew itself, broaden its perspectives, and examine its role from the viewpoint of society, not just its members. This is not impossible, but it requires a willingness from both the trade union movement and politicians alike to engage in constructive dialogue.
In the current political climate, the trade union movement is often seen as an adversary, regardless of party affiliation. Is this polarisation necessary, or could cooperation strengthen both democracy and politicians’ connection to voters?
A question for politicians and all citizens: Do we want to strengthen democracy by ensuring that elected representatives feel accountable to their voters? Or do we accept a development where decision-making moves further away from ordinary people?
Democracy does not crumble overnight but gradually, as decision-making drifts away from the people. Therefore, the key issue is not only who holds power, but to whom they feel accountable.
Will the trade union movement be part of the solution in the future, or will it remain sidelined as economic power becomes increasingly concentrated in fewer hands?
Published in English 22 April 2026.
Written by
